Evanston Police Pension Fund v. McKesson Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EVANSTON POLICE PENSION Case No. 18-cv-06525-CRB

FUND,

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS v.

AND DENYING LEAVE TO MOVE

FOR RECONSIDERATION MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 The Court is in receipt of McKesson Corporation’s Request for Leave to Move for 14 Reconsideration and Clarification (dkt. 70), which urges the Court to reconsider its Order of 15 October 31, 2019 (dkt. 67) denying McKesson’s Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 49). To receive leave to 16 file a motion for reconsideration, a party must demonstrate one of the following: 17 (1) That at the time of the motion for leave, a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the Court before entry of the interlocutory order for which reconsideration is sought. The party also must show that in the exercise of reasonable diligence the party applying for reconsideration did not know such fact or law at…