Olajide

Olajide v. Newsome

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 24, 20193:19-cv-08048California230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 OLADAPO OLAJIDE, Plaintiff, No. C 19-08048 WHA v. ? GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR Defendants. Oa RARY RESTRAINING TO

Following dismissal of the first complaint, motion for temporary restraining order, and application to proceed in forma pauperis for frivolity (Dkt. No. 8), plaintiff returns with an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 11) and new motion for temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 12), having paid the filing fee. Plaintiff's new complaint largely repeats the earlier frivolity, a but generously read, does allege police mistreatment after a June 2017 traffic stop (Dkt. No. 11 at 4-6). “A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed S on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.