Housh
Housh v. Rackley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLOS C. HOUSH, Case No. 17-cv-04222-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
TRANSCRIPTS; GRANTING
v. REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED PETITION
RONALD RACKLEY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 52, 55 Defendant.
12 Petitioner, a pro se prisoner, filed this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Now pending before the Court are petitioner’s “Motion to Object re: Dkt. 48”, Dkt. No. 52, and petitioner’s request that the Court consider a claim that the CDCR has incorrectly calculated his sentence by failing to take into account Propositions 36 and 47, Dkt. No. 55. BACKGROUND The petition alleges the following claims for federal habeas relief: the trial court erred in denying petitioner’s Batson/Wheeler motion; the trial court erred in excluding Dr. Moskowitz’s December 2008 psychiatric report; petitioner was prejudiced by the victim’s references to his custodial status…