Ngo

Ngo v. United Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20193:19-cv-04277California1,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOI NGO,

Case No. 19-cv-04277-JCS Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND VACATING MOTION HEARING UNITED AIRLINES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 14 Defendants.

14 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Ngo filed this action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, asserting state law employment discrimination claims against his former employer, United Airlines (“United”), and two of his former supervisors, Mohammed Buksh and Yvonne Pierce. United removed to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, arguing that although Defendants Buksh and Pierce are citizens of California – as is Ngo – there is diversity of citizenship because Buksh and Pierce were fraudulently joined in this action. In its November 15, 2019 Order (“the November 15 Order”), the Court found that Buksh and Pierce were not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.