Corzine

Corzine v. Maytag Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20195:15-cv-05764California7,366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JULIE CORZINE, Case No. 15-cv-05764-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING (1) CLASS’S

MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF

v. SETTLEMENT AND (2) CLASS’S

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARD Defendant. [Re: ECF 129; 131]

12 Plaintiff Julie Corzine (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool” or “Defendant”) have entered into a Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims (“Settlement Agreement” or “Settlement”) regarding a defect in certain Whirlpool-manufactured refrigerators. Two motions are before the Court: (1) Class’s Motion for Final Approval of Settlement, (Appr. Mot., ECF 131) and (2) Class’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs Reimbursement, and Service Award (Fees Mot., ECF 129). On November 22, 2019, the Court heard oral arguments on both motions (the “Hearing”). For the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.