Racies

Racies v. Quincy Bioscience, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20204:15-cv-00292California4,779 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PHILLIP RACIES, Case No. 15-cv-00292-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER ON REMAINING MOTIONS

IN LIMINE AND ADMINISTRATIVE

v. MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL

QUINCY BIOSCIENCE, LLC, Re: Dkt. Nos. 201, 202, 204, 205, 240, 245 Defendant.

Pending before the Court are the parties’ remaining motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 201, 202, 204, 205. At the December 17, 2019 pretrial conference, the Court indicated that it was likely to exclude Defendant’s witness Lori Osterheldt and Plaintiff’s witness Dr. Patricia Falcone, the subjects of Plaintiff’s third motion in limine and Defendant’s second motion in limine, respectively. Dkt. No. 244 at 24:1–4. The Court now GRANTS the parties’ motions to exclude Ms. Osterheldt and Dr. Falcone, and issues this order explaining its reasoning for the record. The Court also directed the parties to submit detailed offers of proof describing the substance of the proffered evidence at issue in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.