Racies

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PHILLIP RACIES, Case No. 15-cv-00292-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REOPEN DISCOVERY AND

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

QUINCY BIOSCIENCE, LLC, Re: Dkt. Nos. 238, 239 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen discovery to depose a Rule 30(b)(6) witness regarding Defendant’s sales of Prevagen to California consumers. Dkt. No. 239 (“Mot.”). Because Plaintiff fails to establish good cause to reopen discovery, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background This dispute stems from Plaintiff’s second motion in limine, which the Court denied on the record at the December 17, 2019 pretrial conference. Plaintiff’s second motion in limine sought to preclude Defendant from contesting the dollar amount paid by Class Members for Prevagen Products during the Class Period. See generally Dkt. No. 199. Defendant argued that Plaintiff was…