Love

Love v. Hassan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20203:19-cv-01871California741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAMUEL LOVE, Case No. 19-cv-01871-SK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

MOGEEB M. HASSAN, et al., Defendants. Regarding Docket No.

12 Now before the Court is the motion filed by Plaintiff Samuel Love (“Love”) for default judgment against Defendants Mogeeb M. Hassan (“Hassan”) and Eustacio Hernandez (“Hernandez”) (collectively referred to as “Defendants”). As the Court noted at the hearing this morning on the motion for default judgment, the Court has some concerns about the allegations in 16 the Complaint and about the efforts to serve Hernandez which preclude the Court from granting 17 the motion. 18 Plaintiff alleges that Hassan owns the real property located at 2131 MacDonald Avenue in 19 Richmond, California and that Hernandez owned Carniceria La Raza located at the same location. 20 (Dkt. No. 1, ¶¶ 3, 4.) However, Plaintiff also alleges that he: “does not know the true names of 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.