Cunningham

Cunningham v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20194:18-cv-07595California1,471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARCHIBALD ROBERT CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 4:18-cv-07595-KAW

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER REVIEWING

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT; ORDER CONTINUING

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 14 11 Defendants. 12 On May 25, 2018, Plaintiff Archibald Cunningham filed this civil action and application to proceed in forma pauperis. Since Plaintiff was previously found to be vexatious, his complaint was subject to a prefiling order. While his complaint included some of the same parties and claims covered by the prefiling review order, the district court found that it also included parties and certain claims that were arguably outside its scope, so, on November 20, 2018, the court granted leave to proceed on the new complaint. (Dkt. No. 1.) On February 6, 2019, the Court granted the application to proceed in forma pauperis and then screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.