WeWork Companies Inc. v. Weplus (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
WEWORK COMPANIES INC.,
Case No. 5:18-cv-04543-EJD Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL WEPLUS (SHANGHAI) TECHNOLOGY PROCEDURE 12(b)(1) CO., LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 49 Defendants.
This order amends the previous order, see Dkt. 63, in that it removes the previous dismissal with prejudice. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice. See Hampton v. Pac. Inv. Mgmt. Co. LLC, 869 F.3d 844, 846 (9th Cir. 2017) (“Dismissals for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, on the other hand, must be without prejudice, because a lack of jurisdiction deprives the dismissing court of any power to adjudicate the merits of the case.”). Before the Court is Defendant We+ (Shanghai) Technology’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Fed. R.…