Forsyth

Forsyth v. HP Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20205:16-cv-04775California3,317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DONNA J. FORSYTH, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-04775-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING BRYANT v. FONSECA’S MOTION TO INTERVENE AS A PLAINTIFF HP INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 346 Defendants.

On August 18, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a putative class action alleging that Defendants violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), and other California laws. Complaint ¶ 4, Dkt. 1. Bryant Fonseca (“Fonseca”) seeks to intervene in this action. Notice and Motion for Intervention as Plaintiff and Memorandum of Points and Authorities (“Mot.”), Dkt. 346. Both Plaintiffs and Defendants oppose Fonseca’s motion to intervene. The Court finds this motion suitable for consideration without oral argument. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.