Rodriquez

Rodriquez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20203:19-cv-02003California6,981 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RAMONA R., Case No. 19-cv-02003-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 19,

SECURITY,

12 Defendant. 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Ramona R. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security that denied Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 19 (Pl.’s Mot.), 25 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have been submitted on the papers without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s motion and GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion for the following reasons. II. BACKGROUND A. Age, Education and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.