Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Adobe Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20204:18-cv-01553California3,962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING

CORPORATION, Case No. 18-cv-1553 YGR

PLAINTIFF,

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 4 RE: MOTIONS

V. IN LIMINE

ADOBE INC. F/K/A, ADOBE SYSTEMS

INCORPORATED

DEFENDANT.

12 ____________________________________

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

14 Before the Court are the parties’ respective motions in limine (“MIL”). (Dkt. Nos. 250, 251, 15 253, 254, 255, 254, 257, 258, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 266, 267, 268, 269, 271, 272, 274.) Having 16 considered the papers submitted, the filings to date, and the other arguments and submissions at the 17 Pretrial Conference held on December 20, 2019, the Court finds the following as to each motion in 18 limine:

20 Dolby’s MIL Requested Relief and Basis for Relief MIL 1: Dolby need not offer the Fourth Adobe Offerings Chart into evidence with the prior versions, and that version is excluded, Fourth “Adobe because Adobe should not be permitted to take back facts that Offerings Chart” were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.