Macias

Macias v. Gen San Jose, LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20205:19-cv-02355California176 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LENA MACIAS, Case No.19-cv-02355-NC Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL

DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. No. 22 GEN SAN JOSE, LP, et al., 13 Defendants.

Q The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this

|} action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 19 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 20 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 || Dated: January 8, 2020 hGe<——— —_—>

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.