Munoz

Munoz v. Erguiza

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20205:18-cv-04655California5,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

. 5 6 7 _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDUARDO MUNOZ,

Case No. 18-04655 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, . « ORDER GRANTING v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 3 RANDULF ERGUIZA,

Defendant. : (Docket No. 20) Bou

Zz Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed a pro se civil rights complaints under 42 U.S.C. || § 1983 against Defendant Nurse Practitioner Randulf Erguiza at Salinas Valley State || Prison (“SVSP”). The Honorable Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James found the || complaint, (Docket No. 1), when liberally construed, stated a cognizable Eighth || Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical needs, and || scheduled briefing on the matter. (Docket No. 9.) The matter was subsequently 24 || reassigned to this Court on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.