Hamilton

Hamilton v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20203:19-cv-06319California1,759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL C. HAMILTON, Case No. 19-cv-06319-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

v. INTERIM RELIEF

RON DAVIS, et al., Docket No. 11 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Paul Hamilton, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison, filed this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an order filed December 20, 2019, the Court ordered Mr. Hamilton to show cause why the action should not be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Mr. Hamilton has filed more than three previous actions that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Mr. Hamilton’s response to the order to show cause is due by January 24, 2020. In the meantime, Mr. Hamilton has filed a request for an “emergency temporary injunction,” Docket No. 11, that is now before the Court for consideration. II. BACKGROUND 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.