Skidmore
Skidmore v. Lizarraga
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
CARL SKIDMORE,
Case No. 14-cv-04222-BLF Petitioner, ORDER RE PETITIONER’S v. AMENDED MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO JOE LIZARRAGA, Warden of California FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL State Prison at Mule Creek, PROCEDURE 59(e) Respondent. [Re: ECF 98]
12 Before the Court is Petitioner Carl Skidmore’s amended motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (“amended Rule 59(e) motion”), which was filed on September 19, 2019. See Amended Rule 59(e) Motion, ECF 98. Briefing on the motion was completed on October 7, 2019. See Opposition, ECF 99; Reply, ECF 100. The amended Rule 59(e) motion was not noticed for hearing, and the Court finds it suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The amended Rule 59(e) motion is DENIED to the…