Moore
Moore v. Addus Healthcare, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARY MOORE, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01519-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF
ENCINIAS FOR FAILURE TO
v. PROSECUTE AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL'S ADDUS HEALTHCARE, INC., et al., MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS
ATTORNEY
Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 51, 52 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion to withdraw as attorney for 13 Plaintiff Encinias, Dkt. No. 51, and Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Encinias for failure to 14 prosecute, Dkt. No. 52. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS both motions.
I. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY (DKT. NO. 51)
16 On July 11, 2017, Plaintiff Mary Moore filed this putative class action in Alameda 17 Superior Court. See Dkt. No. 1 Ex. A. On March 21, 2019, an amended complaint was filed, 18 which added Alexandria Encinias as a Plaintiff and Addus HomeCare, Inc. as a Defendant. See 19 Dkt. No. 1-1 Ex. N (“FAC”). 20 Plaintiffs’ counsel, Tatiana G. Avakian of Marlin & Saltzman,…