Cisneros

Cisneros v. Vangilder

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20204:16-cv-00735California3,086 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL CISNEROS, Case No. 16-cv-00735-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

CUPP’S RENEWED MOTION FOR

v. JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW

J. VANGILDER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 214 Defendants. DANIEL MANRIQUEZ, Case No. 16-cv-01320-HSG Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No. 217 v.

J. VANGILDER, et al., Defendants.

17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Sergeant Scott Cupp’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, following a jury trial in two related matters, Cisneros v. Vangilder, No. 16-cv-0735-HSG, and Manriquez v. Vangilder, No. 16-cv-1320-HSG. The Court held a hearing on the motion on December 11, 2019. See Cisneros, No. 16-cv-0735-HSG, Dkt. No. 219. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion, finding that Defendant Cupp is entitled to qualified immunity. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.