Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20203:17-cv-04738California4,086 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC, Case No. 3:17-cv-04738-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON THE SCOPE OF IPR

v. ESTOPPEL AND ON GOPRO'S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

GOPRO, INC., INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 313, 316

12 After a stay pending inter partes review (“IPR”), this patent infringement case has resumed with new counsel and new vigor. Before me is defendant GoPro, Inc.’s motion to amend its invalidity contentions, which plaintiff Contour IP Holdings, LLC opposes in part. The parties also ask that I determine the impact of IPR estoppel on GoPro’s case. As set forth below, I grant in part and deny in part GoPro’s motion to amend and provide the parties with guidance on estoppel. BACKGROUND In November 2014, the Patent Office issued U.S. Patent Nos. 8,890,954 (“the ’954 Patent”) and 8,896,694 (“the ’694 Patent”) to non-party Contour LLC. The patents claimed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.