Banks-Reed

Banks-Reed v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20204:18-cv-05755California2,724 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOLANDA BANKS-REED, ET AL., Case No. 18-cv-5755 YGR Plaintiffs,

v. PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 1 RE: PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE

BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, ET AL.,

Defendant. 11 Having considered the filings to date and the arguments and other submissions at the 12 Pretrial Conference, held on January 10, 2020, for good cause shown the Court enters the 13 following orders. The parties should pay close attention to the filing deadlines as some may have 14 been modified to account for the possibility of jury selection on January 31, 2020. Thus: 15 1. Motion to Stay: Defendant Mateu filed a motion to stay this case pending the outcome of the 16 appeal of this Court’s November 15, 2019 order denying in part defendant’s motion for 17 summary judgment. (Dkt. 64.) In its order, the Court denied defendant’s motion for summary 18 judgment as to plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claim, including on qualified immunity, because 19 material factual disputes existed. “[F]or purposes of determining whether [] alleged conduct 20 violates clearly established law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.