Hungerstation LLC v. Fast Choice LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20204:19-cv-05861California4,850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HUNGERSTATION LLC, Case No. 19-cv-05861-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

AND MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION

FAST CHOICE LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 23, 35, 45 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are three motions: (1) Defendant Fast Choice LLC’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and based on forum non conveniens, Dkt. No. 12; (2) Defendant Inspiring Trading Apps LLC’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, improper service, and failure to state a claim, Dkt. No. 35; and (3) Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, Dkt. No. 23. Because the Court finds that it does not have personal jurisdiction over Defendants, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions to dismiss and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Hungerstation LLC, Defendant Fast Choice LLC d/b/a Pace, and Defendant Inspiring Trading Apps LLC d/b/a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.