Delacruz

Delacruz v. The State Bar of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20205:19-cv-03241California10,993 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DANIEL DELACRUZ, Case No. 19-CV-03241-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v.

MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS AND

GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, et MOTION FOR SANCTIONS al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 34, 35, 49 Defendants.

Plaintiff Daniel Delacruz, Sr. brings suit against a number of individuals and entities related to the denial of his license to practice law. Before the Court are two motions to dismiss: a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants City of Fresno, the Fresno Police Department, Steven Card, Cathy Sherman, and the law firm Ferguson, Praet, & Sherman APC (collectively, the “Fresno Defendants”), ECF No. 33; and a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants the State Bar of California and Steven James Moawad (collectively, the “State Bar Defendants”), ECF No. 34. Additionally, both Delacruz and the State Bar Defendants have moved for sanctions. ECF Nos. 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.