Cruz

Cruz v. Kumbat

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20204:19-cv-05825California2,475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 19-cv-05825-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY IN

FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS SHOULD

v. NOT BE REVOKED

KUMBAT, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 18, 2019. On December 30, 2019, the Court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 8. On January 2, 2020, the Court screened the complaint and found that the complaint’s allegation that, on July 19, 2018, defendant Kumbat sexually harassed plaintiff stated an Eighth Amendment claim for sexual harassment and the complaint’s allegation that defendant Kumbat subsequently deliberately spread a rumor that she had been sexually harassed by plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on deliberate indifference to inmate safety. Dkt. No. 9. The Court has since learned that,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.