Daniel

Daniel v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20204:19-cv-03319California534 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DOMINIC TYRELL DANIEL, Case No. 19-cv-03319-HSG

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

FILE PROBATION OFFICER’S

v. REPORT UNDER SEAL

ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Re: Dkt. No. 13 Respondent.

12 Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed this habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. On August 27, 2019, the Court ordered respondent to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on petitioner’s cognizable claims. Dkt. No. 9. Respondent has filed an answer to the order to show cause and has requested to file under seal the Alameda County Probation Officer’s Report, which is located at pages 365-398 of the state court clerk’s transcript on appeal and is lodged as Exhibit 14 to the Answer. Dkt. No. 13. Respondent argues that Cal. R. Ct. 8.45-8.47 require that personal information in a probation report be kept confidential, citing People v. Connor, 115 Cal.App.4th 669 (Cal. Ct. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.