Williamson
Williamson v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EARNIE WILLIAMSON, Case No. 18-cv-04906-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 21, 22 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff Earnie Williamson seeks social security benefits for a variety of physical and mental impairments including PTSD, gout, arthritis, poor circulation, chronic back and knee pain, and hearing loss. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 62, 242, 1022.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his benefits claim. Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 21 & 22.2) Because the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to deny benefits is supported by substantial evidence and otherwise free of legal error, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion and GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion. …