Alvarez

Alvarez v. Simmons

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20203:18-cv-04267California679 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SERGIO A. ALVAREZ, Case No. 18-cv-04267-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES

v. AND REGARDING SERVICE ON

DEFENDANT DORFMAN

Y. SIMMONS, et al., Docket No. 22 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff’s request for a 60-day extension of the deadline to file his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Docket No. 22. The Court now sets the following new briefing schedule: Plaintiff must file and serve his opposition to the motion for summary judgment no later than March 13, 2020. No further extensions of this deadline should be expected. Defendants must file and serve their reply, if any, no later than March 27, 2020. There will not be a hearing on the motion because the motion will be decided on the papers filed by the parties. The Court ordered service of process on five Defendants, only four of whom have appeared. Dr. A. Dorfman has not yet been served or appeared in this action. After attempting 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.