Najafi

Najafi v. Pompeo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20204:19-cv-05782California919 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SONA NAJAFI, et al., Case No. 19-cv-05782-KAW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

v. LETTER; DENYING REQUEST FOR

RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE

MICHAEL R. POMPEO, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 36, 44 Defendants.

12 On September 15, 2019, Plaintiffs filed the instant case against Defendants, challenging Defendants’ alleged withholding of adjudications of case-by-case waivers of Presidential Proclamation 9645 (“PP9645”). (Compl. ¶ 1, Dkt. No. 1.) PP 9645 prohibits the entry of immigrants and non-immigrants from Iran and other countries, but permits consular officers to grant waivers under certain circumstances. Pending before the Court are: (1) a November 27, 2019 discovery letter regarding Plaintiffs’ interrogatories, and (2) Plaintiffs’ January 3, 2020 request for a Rule 26(f) case management conference. (Discovery Letter, Dkt. No. 36; Pls.’ Rule 26(f) Mot., Dkt. No. 44.) A. Discovery Letter Each interrogatory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.