Singh

Singh v. American Postal Workers Union Oakland Local 78

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20203:19-cv-06659California536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PREET M. SINGH, Case No. 19-cv-06659-VC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS Re: Dkt. No. 7 UNION OAKLAND LOCAL 78, et al., Defendants.

The federal defendants’ motion to dismiss the third amended complaint is granted. The Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the claims against the union, the only remaining defendant. See Swett v. Schenk, 792 F.2d 1447, 1450 (9th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to remand the case to Alameda County Superior Court. For all claims that Singh pursues against the federal employee defendants, the Postal Service has certified that those employees were acting within the scope of their employment. See Certification Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d), Dkt. No. 7-1, at 88-89. The determination is made according to principles of California law, because the underlying events took place in California. Clamor v. United States, 240 F.3d 1215, 1217 (9th Cir. 2001). Singh alleges that the employees acted maliciously, and he contends that their conduct was therefore beyond the scope of their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.