Scott

Scott v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20204:19-cv-06046California1,412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DONNIE SCOTT, Case No. 19-cv-06046-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. Re: Dkt. No. 12 ERIC GOLDING, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at California State Prison – Los Angeles County, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that officials at Pelican Bay State Prison, where he was previously housed, violated his constitutional rights. His amended complaint (Dkt. No. 12) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity, or from an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.