Jones

Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20203:15-cv-02726California4,970 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMANDA JONES, Case No. 15-cv-02726-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER Re: Dkt. No. 203 CORPORATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Amanda Jones’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s October 10, 2019 Order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants. ECF No. 203. Defendants filed an Opposition (ECF No. 207) and Jones filed a Reply (ECF No. 211). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Jones’s motion for the following reasons. II. BACKGROUND The Court summarized the facts in its October 10, 2019 order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (the “Order”):

On August 25, 2014, Plaintiff Amanda Jones, then a resident of Chicago, was in Santa Cruz to attend a three- to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.