Card

Card v. Ralph Lauren Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20203:18-cv-02553California4,454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 VICTORIA CARD, Case No. 18-cv-02553-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 66 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Victoria Card filed this civil action in San Francisco Superior Court alleging various claims arising out of a business arrangement between Plaintiff and Defendants the Ralph Lauren Corporation, Ralph Lauren Company West, LLC, and E.J Victor Inc, which Defendants terminated in May 2015. Following extensive motion practice regarding the pleadings, the parties jointly requested that the action be stayed pending mediation. That mediation was unsuccessful and Defendants now move to dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 66.2) Having considered the parties’ briefs and having had the benefit of oral argument on January 16, 2020, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The motion is denied with respect…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.