In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20203:19-cv-05822California772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 In re: No. C 19-05822 WHA GLUMETZA ANTITRUST No. C 19-05831 WHA LITIGATION. No. C 19-06138 WHA No. C 19-06156 WHA No. C 19-06839 WHA No. C 19-07843 WHA This Document Relates To: 14 (CONSOLIDATED)

ALL ACTIONS.

ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE &

ELECTRONICALLY STORED

INFORMATION ORDERS

18 The stipulated protective order (Dkt. No. 113-1) and electronically stored information 19 order (Dkt. No. 113-2) submitted by the parties are hereby Approved, subject to the following 20 conditions, including adherence to the Ninth Circuit’s strict caution against sealing orders (as 21 set out below): 22 1. The parties must make a good-faith determination that any information designated 23 “confidential” truly warrants protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure. Designations of material as “confidential” must be narrowly tailored to include 25 only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.