Grace

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHRISTINA GRACE, et al., Case No. 17-CV-00551-LHK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339

APPLE, INC., Defendant. 17 Before the Court are the motions in limine of Apple, Inc. (“Apple”),1 ECF Nos. 334, 335, 336; and the motions in limine of Plaintiffs, ECF No. 337, 338, 339. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, the case law, and the record in this case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules as follows: Apple’s Motions in Limine (“MIL”) MIL # 1: Apple seeks to exclude all evidence and testimony regarding prior patent infringement lawsuits and verdicts against Apple. ECF No. 334. Plaintiffs oppose. ECF No. 345.

1 Both parties filed motions in limine, ECF Nos. 334, 336, 337, that exceeded the three-page limit that the Court imposed. ECF No. 307 (“Each motion in limine and opposition is…