Tanseer Kazi v. PNC, Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20203:18-cv-04810California921 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TANSEER KAZI, et al., Case No. 18-cv-04810-JCS

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

FILE UNDER SEAL

PNC, BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. Nos. 72, 76, 80 Defendant.

I. LEGAL STANDARD In order to rebut the presumption of public access to judicial proceedings, a party must show “compelling reasons” to maintain documents under seal if they are filed in connection with motions “more than tangentially related to the merits of a case.” Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101 (9th Cir. 2016). The present motion for class certification meets that standard. Under this Court’s local rules, a request to seal also must be “narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material.” Civ. L.R. 79-5(b). II. MOTION TO SEAL PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Plaintiffs Tanseer Kazi and Linda Scheid filed an administrative motion to seal portions of their motion for class certification, as well as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.