Finley
Finley v. Transunion
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LATONYA RENA FINLEY, Case No. 17-cv-07165-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 103, 105 TRANSUNION, et al., Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court are motions to dismiss Plaintiff Latonya Rena Finley’s third amended complaint, filed by Defendant Plaza Services LLC, see Dkt. No. 103, and Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, and Equifax Information Services LLC (collectively, “Consumer Reporting Agencies” or “CRAs”), see Dkt. No. 105. The Court held a hearing on January 23, 2020. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action against Defendants on December 18, 2017, alleging that Defendants violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq., and related state laws, based on a disputed debt that remains on Plaintiff’s credit report. See Dkt. No. 1. …