Dodocase VR, Inc. v. Merchsource, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20203:17-cv-07088California6,833 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DODOCASE VR, INC., et al., Case No. 17-cv-07088-JCS

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO STRIKE AND DENYING

MERCHSOURCE, LLC, et al., PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS

Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 129, 140 12 Plaintiffs Dodocase VR, Inc (“Dodocase”) and DDC Technology, LLC (“DDC”) (together, “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion to strike Defendants MerchSource LLC (“MerchSource”) and Threesixty Brands Group LLC’s (“Threesixty”) (together, “Defendants”) amended answer to the second amended complaint (“SAC”). Plaintiffs also filed a motion for sanctions against Defendants. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court concludes that these matters are suitable for decision without a hearing. The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ motion to strike. The Court further DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions. I. BACKGROUND On December 13, 2017, Plaintiff Dodocase filed its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.