Hollis

Hollis v. Risenhoover

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20205:17-cv-00326California3,553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS,

Case No. 17-00326 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

AMEND/CORRECT COMPLAINT;

DENYING MOTION FOR MEDICAL v. RECORDS; DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY; GRANTING

MOTION TO CORRECT

DEFENDANTS’ NAMES; DENYING NURSE REISENHOOVER, et al., MOTIONS FOR EXPERT WITNESS AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; Defendants. DENYING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; GRANTING MOTIONS FOR

EXTENSIONS OF TIME

15 (Docket Nos. 114, 115, 117, 120, 121, 124, 16 126, 129, 134, 136) 17 18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical officials at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), where 20 Plaintiff was formerly housed. Finding the complaint stated a cognizable Eighth 21 Amendment claim for deliberate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.