Hollis
Hollis v. Risenhoover
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20205:17-cv-00326California3,553 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS,
Case No. 17-00326 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
AMEND/CORRECT COMPLAINT;
DENYING MOTION FOR MEDICAL v. RECORDS; DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY; GRANTING
MOTION TO CORRECT
DEFENDANTS’ NAMES; DENYING NURSE REISENHOOVER, et al., MOTIONS FOR EXPERT WITNESS AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; Defendants. DENYING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; GRANTING MOTIONS FOR
EXTENSIONS OF TIME
15 (Docket Nos. 114, 115, 117, 120, 121, 124, 16 126, 129, 134, 136) 17 18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical officials at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), where 20 Plaintiff was formerly housed. Finding the complaint stated a cognizable Eighth 21 Amendment claim for deliberate…