McCullom

McCullom v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20205:19-cv-06003California1,864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN LEE MCCULLOM, Case No. 19-06003 BLF (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

Plaintiff, LEAVE TO AMEND v.

ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPT., et al.,

Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed documents which were construed as an attempt to open a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Docket No. 1.) In response to a Clerk’s notice advising him that the complaint was not submitted on the proper form, (Docket No. 3), Plaintiff filed a complaint using the court’s form along with attachments. (Docket No. 5.) Before the Court had an opportunity to screen the complaint, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on November 4, 2019, titled “amended class action 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint [sic].” (Docket No. 8 at 1.) The Court finds that the amended complaint is the operative complaint in this matter. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.