Beasley

Beasley v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20203:18-cv-07144California4,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MARK BEASLEY, Case No. 18-cv-07144-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS

LUCKY STORES, INC., et al., Defendants.

Before the Court is defendants’ Motion, filed October 25, 2019, to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff Mark Beasley (“Beasley”) has filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND The instant case is a putative class action lawsuit brought by Beasley, a California citizen, as a purchaser and consumer of Coffee-mate, a line of coffee-creamer products. Beasley alleges defendant Nestlé USA, Inc. (“Nestlé”) “manufactures, markets, and sells” Coffee-mate. (See Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), filed October 4, 2019, ¶ 3.) He also alleges that four retailers, namely, defendants Lucky Stores, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.