Stuckey

Stuckey v. Howard

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20204:19-cv-03691California2,636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY,

Case No. 19-cv-03691-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL v. AND SERVICE

D. HOWARD, et al.,

7 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The operative complaint is the Amended Complaint. Dkt. 9. He seeks monetary damages. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 10. Plaintiff has named California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) Secretary Ralph Diaz, CDCR Director Connie Gipson, Office of Appeals (“OOA”) at CDCR Appeals Examiners M. Hodges and S. K. Hemenway, and the following Defendants at PBSP: Warden Jim Robertson; Lieutenant T. S. Buchanan; Sergeant Skerik; and Officers D. Howard, C. Contreras, S. Peterson, A. Corder, Pope, M. Ford, Villarreal, Balestra, Frawley, and C. Sturdevant. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.