NetSoc, LLC v. Quora, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20203:19-cv-06518California472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NETSOC, LLC, Case No. 19-cv-06518-VC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS; DENYING MOTION TO

AMEND

QUORA, INC.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 78, 80 Defendant.

Quora’s motion to dismiss is granted. The ’591 patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. 1. The ’591 patent is directed to the abstract idea of a social network. See ’591 Pat. 1:1-4 (“Method and System for Establishing and Using a Social Network to Facilitate People in Life Issues”); Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 84, at 12-14; see also Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 134 S. Ct. 2347, 2355 (2014). NetSoc’s assertion that a computer- implemented social network does not fall within section 101’s implicit exception for abstract ideas is wrong. See 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance (USPTO), 84 Fed. Reg. 52 (January 7, 2019) (explaining that methods for “managing . . . relationships or interactions between people (including social activities . . .)” are unpatentable abstract ideas); Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA), 792 F.3d 1363, 1366 (Fed. Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.