Fujita

Fujita v. The Best Service Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20204:19-cv-00580California1,974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

9 10 KEIKI KAY MITSU FUJITA, Case No: C 19-00580 SBA 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY vs. DEFENDANT HARRIS & ZIDE 13 THE BEST SERVICE COMPANY, et al., Dkt. 36 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Keiki Kay Mitsu Fujita (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant pro se action alleging 18 claims, inter alia, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), id. § 1681 et seq., and the 19 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. As party- 20 defendants, Plaintiff has named The Best Service Company (“Best”); Hunt & Henriques 21 (“Hunt”); and Harris & Zide (“Harris”). Only Harris and Hunt remain as party-defendants 22 in the action. The parties are presently before the Court on the Harris’ Motion for Summary 24 Judgment. Dkt. 36. Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with this 25 matter and being fully informed, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for the reasons set 26 forth below. The Court, in its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.