Wolf

Landeros Jimenez v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20205:19-cv-07996California2,422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MARIO LANDEROS JIMENEZ, Case No. 19-cv-07996-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS v. Re: Dkt. No. 1 CHAD WOLF, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Habeas petitioner Mario Landeros Jimenez has been detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) since January 2019 pending removal proceedings. See Dkt. No. 1. According to Landeros Jimenez, respondent federal officers’ failure to provide him with a bond hearing after holding him for nearly a year in custody is unlawful under the Fifth Amendment, Eighth Amendment, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Id. Landeros Jimenez now seeks a writ of habeas corpus or, in the alternative, a bond hearing before an immigration judge (“IJ”). Id. The Court GRANTS Landeros Jimenez’s petition as to his first claim under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. Respondents must release Landeros Jimenez from custody or provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.