Stuckey

Stuckey v. Risenhoover

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20204:19-cv-03780California2,532 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY,

Case No. 19-cv-03780-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN v. CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO FILING IN EASTERN DISTRICT; BILL WOODS, et al., SERVING COGNIZABLE CLAIMS; AND DISMISSING REMAINING Defendants. CLAIMS

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. 1. He seeks monetary damages. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 8. Plaintiff has named the following Defendants at PBSP: Chief Executive Office (“CEO”) at the California Correctional Health Care Services (“CCHCS”) Bill Woods; Chief of Health Care at CCHCS S. Gates; and Doctors Sue Risenhoover, Maria Bostanjian, Devinder Kumar, and Laurie Thomas. He also names the following Defendants at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.