In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20204:18-cv-01885California1,744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 8 IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT Case No. 4:18-cv-01885-HSG

LITIGATION

STIPULATED AND UNOPPOSED

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL; ORDER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V. and U.S. Philips Corporation (collectively, “Philips”) and Defendants Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Mobile Inc. (collectively, “Microsoft”) have entered into a confidential settlement agreement resolving all claims between them in this action (“the Philips/Microsoft Claims”). Therefore, Philips and Microsoft jointly file this motion under Civil L.R. 7-12 asking the Court to enter the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal filed herewith, which dismisses the Philips/Microsoft Claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) (“Rule 41(a)(2)”) under the terms set forth in that Stipulation of Dismissal. Of note, lead counsel for Philips has attempted to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.