NetFuel, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20205:18-cv-02352California905 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

NETFUEL, INC.,

Case No. 5:18-cv-02352-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CISCO SYSTEMS INC., MOTION

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 269

Cisco’s has filed an administrative motion seeking leave to file a second summary judgment motion. The administrative motion is denied. In the Joint Case Management Statement filed one week in advance of the February 28, 2019 Case Management Conference, Cisco asked the Court to modify the pretrial schedule so that it could file an early motion for summary judgment on noninfringement (the “MSJ”). Dkt. No. 64 at 12. Cisco’s proposed modification of the case schedule called for two periods for expert discovery, an early one for the noninfringement issue and the second for other matters. Id. at 12- 14. In that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.