Monplaisir

Monplaisir v. Integrated Tech Group, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20203:19-cv-01484California772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL MONPLAISIR, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 19-01484 WHA

v.

INTEGRATED TECH GROUP, LLC, et al., ORDER FINDING CALIFORNIA

LAW APPROPRIATE FOR

Defendants.

APPLICATION TO MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION

15 In this wage and hour putative class action, defendants moved to compel arbitration, plaintiffs opposed, defendants replied, and both parties briefed the validity and enforceability of the arbitration agreement under federal and California law (Dkt. Nos. 65, 67, 71). The agreement states:

10. Substantive Law. The Arbitrator shall apply the substantive state or federal law (and the law of remedies, if applicable) as applicable to the claim(s) asserted. Claims arising under federal law shall be determined in accordance with federal law. Common law claims shall be decided in accordance with Florida substantive law, without regard to conflict of laws principles. 23 A December 30 order asked the parties to either stipulate to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.