Proofpoint, Inc. v. Vade Secure, Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04238-MMC (RMI)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 78, 91, 92, 93 VADE SECURE, INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants.
13 Now pending before the court are a series of discovery disputes presented through three jointly filed letter briefs (dkts. 91, 92, 93). Previously, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel (dkt. 78) production of documents and interrogatory responses which had been the subject of an objection by Defendants based on French law; thereafter, the matter was referred to the undersigned and the Parties were instructed to proceed by letter brief (dkt. 79). As described below, and for the reasons stated on the record, the relief sought in the motion to compel and the three letters briefs is granted in part and denied in part. In the first letter brief (dkt. 91), Plaintiffs seek an order compelling Defendants to produce documents that are responsive to Plaintiffs’…