Shin

Shin v. Plantronics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20205:18-cv-05626California2,589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 PHIL SHIN, Case No. 18-cv-05626-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS v. ACTION SETTLEMENT 13 PLANTRONICS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 87 14 Defendant. 15 16 Before the Court is plaintiff Phil Shin’s motion for final approval of a proposed class action settlement between defendant Plantronics, Inc. and a class of Plantronics headphone purchasers. See Dkt. No. 87. Shin also moves for attorneys’ fees. The Court will address the attorneys’ fees motion in a separate order. The terms of the settlement are set forth in the amended Settlement. See Dkt. Nos. 70-1, 70-2. Because the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, the Court GRANTS final approval of the settlement. I. Background A. Factual and Procedural Background Shin accuses defendant Plantronics, Inc. of selling defective BackBeat FIT wireless headphones (“Headphones”), marketing them as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.